From "Which Direction?" to "How Much?"
In Section 2.1 we built two foundational ideas: when a price changes, quantity demanded moves in the opposite direction, and when a price changes, quantity supplied moves in the same direction. Those are statements about direction โ they tell us "up or down," but they don't say anything about how much.
Here's the thing โ direction alone isn't enough for serious analysis. Imagine you're the manager of a movie theater deciding whether to raise ticket prices by $2. You already know quantity demanded will fall (Law of Demand). But what you actually care about is: will my revenue go up or down? If your loyal customers barely react, raising the price puts more money in your pocket. If they bail at the first sign of a hike, raising the price could destroy your business.
The same question hits a senator deciding on a soda tax (will consumption really fall enough to fight obesity?), a farmer reacting to a drought (do higher prices fully offset lost crops?), and a transit authority raising bus fares (will revenue rise or fall?). All these decisions depend on the same concept: elasticity.
Elasticity is a measure of how responsive one economic variable is to a change in another. It quantifies the strength of a relationship โ answering "how much" rather than just "which direction."
In this section, we'll meet four different elasticities โ all built on the same percentage-change idea โ and learn how to read what each one says. You'll see why elasticity is one of the most-tested concepts on the AP exam: it shows up in nearly every Unit 2 multiple-choice and appears again throughout Units 3, 4, and 6.
Price Elasticity of Demand (PED)
Let's start with the most important elasticity on the exam โ the one that measures how much consumers respond to a change in the price of a good.
Price Elasticity of Demand (PED): A measure of how responsive quantity demanded is to a change in the good's own price. Formally, it's the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in price.
The PED Formula
Read: "the percent change in quantity demanded, divided by the percent change in price."
Why the Absolute Value?
By the Law of Demand, price and quantity demanded move in opposite directions โ so technically, PED is always a negative number. A 10% rise in price brings a, say, 25% fall in quantity, giving โ2.5. But that minus sign is just a leftover from the Law of Demand, not new information. To avoid the headache, economists (and the AP exam) take the absolute value. Going forward, we'll just write PED and treat it as positive.
A Quick Worked Example
Suppose a coffee shop raises the price of a latte from $4 to $5 โ a 25% increase in price. Daily lattes sold fall from 200 to 150 โ a 25% decrease in quantity. The PED is:
A PED of exactly 1 has a special name โ "unit elastic." We'll get to what that means in a moment. For now, just notice the mechanic: compute two percentage changes, divide them, take the absolute value. That's it.
๐ Computing percentage change: %ฮX = (Xnew โ Xold) / Xold ร 100. The denominator is the starting value, just like with the inflation rate. (Some textbooks teach the "midpoint method," but the AP almost always gives clean percentages directly, so you rarely need it.)
Interpreting the PED Coefficient
The number itself isn't the answer โ what matters is what category it falls into. There are five named categories of PED, defined by where the coefficient sits relative to 1.
Perfectly Inelastic
|PED| = 0
Qd doesn't change at all when P changes. Vertical demand curve.
Inelastic
0 < |PED| < 1
Qd changes by a smaller percent than P. Consumers don't react much.
Unit Elastic
|PED| = 1
Qd changes by the same percent as P.
Elastic
|PED| > 1
Qd changes by a larger percent than P. Consumers react strongly.
Perfectly Elastic
|PED| = โ
Tiny price change โ infinite change in Qd. Horizontal demand curve.
The Two Extreme Cases โ Concrete Examples
The two extremes (perfectly inelastic and perfectly elastic) sound weird at first. Let me anchor them with real-world examples.
| Extreme | What it means | Real-world example |
|---|---|---|
| Perfectly Inelastic (|PED| = 0) |
Consumers buy the same quantity regardless of price. The demand curve is a vertical line. | A diabetic's insulin. Whether it's $20 or $200, they buy the same dose โ survival doesn't bargain-hunt. |
| Perfectly Elastic (|PED| = โ) |
Consumers buy unlimited quantity at one specific price and zero quantity at any higher price. The demand curve is a horizontal line. | A single farmer selling wheat in a perfectly competitive market. At the going market price, buyers will take everything; raise your price a penny and you sell zero (they go to other farmers). We'll meet this again in Unit 3. |
Visualizing the Five Cases
๐ง Memory trick: Elastic = stretchy = responsive = flat curve. Inelastic = stiff = unresponsive = steep curve. The slope of the curve gives you a rough visual cue (though slope โ elasticity exactly, as we'll see).
What Makes Demand More or Less Elastic?
Why is demand for insulin nearly inelastic while demand for Cherry Coke is fairly elastic? Four factors drive a good's PED, and the College Board tests these directly on nearly every Unit 2 exam.
1. Availability of Substitutes (the biggest one)
The more close substitutes a good has, the more elastic its demand. If the price rises, consumers can easily switch โ so quantity demanded falls a lot.
Examples:
- Pepsi โ many substitutes (Coke, Dr Pepper, Sprite, sparkling water). Highly elastic. If Pepsi raises its price 10%, sales fall sharply as consumers switch.
- Insulin โ no substitute for type 1 diabetics. Highly inelastic. Price changes barely affect quantity.
- Salt โ almost no substitutes for the function it serves. Inelastic.
This single factor explains most of what you'll see on the AP exam. Whenever the question says "more close substitutes are available," elasticity rises.
2. Necessity vs. Luxury
Necessities tend to have inelastic demand โ you keep buying them even when prices rise because you need them. Luxuries tend to have elastic demand โ you can postpone or skip them entirely when prices rise.
Examples: Gasoline (necessity for commuters) โ inelastic. A vacation cruise (luxury) โ elastic. Prescription medications (necessity) โ inelastic. Designer handbags (luxury) โ elastic.
3. Share of Income Spent on the Good
The bigger the share of your budget a good takes up, the more elastic demand becomes. Why? Because a price change on a big-ticket item hits your budget hard, forcing you to reconsider. A price change on a tiny purchase barely registers.
Examples:
- Salt โ costs pennies a year. Even if the price doubles, you won't really notice or reduce consumption. Inelastic.
- Cars โ a major purchase. A 10% price increase translates to thousands of dollars, making buyers shop carefully and possibly delay. Elastic.
4. Time Horizon
The longer the time period, the more elastic demand becomes. In the short run, consumers are locked into habits and can't easily change. Given more time, they find substitutes, change behaviors, and adjust.
Classic example โ gasoline:
- Short run (a week or two after price spike): You still need to drive to work, so you keep buying gas. Demand is inelastic.
- Long run (a few years): You consider buying a hybrid, moving closer to work, using public transit, or carpooling. Demand becomes much more elastic.
Summary Table
| Determinant | Demand is MORE ELASTIC whenโฆ | Demand is MORE INELASTIC whenโฆ |
|---|---|---|
| Substitutes | Many close substitutes available | Few or no substitutes |
| Necessity vs. Luxury | The good is a luxury | The good is a necessity |
| Share of Income | The good takes a large share of income | The good takes a tiny share of income |
| Time Horizon | Longer time period considered | Shorter time period considered |
The Total Revenue Test (Most Tested Concept!)
This is the single most heavily tested elasticity concept on the AP exam. The Total Revenue Test connects a producer's pricing decision to elasticity in a way you must know cold.
Total Revenue (TR) = Price ร Quantity sold.
When a seller changes their price, two things happen at once: price changes and quantity sold changes (the opposite direction, by the Law of Demand). Whether TR rises or falls depends on which percentage change is bigger โ and that's exactly what PED measures.
The Three Rules
Total Revenue Test
If demand is ELASTIC โ P and TR move in OPPOSITE directions
If demand is INELASTIC โ P and TR move in the SAME direction
If demand is UNIT ELASTIC โ TR doesn't change at all
Why? The Intuition
Suppose the seller raises the price by 10%. Two forces hit revenue:
- Price effect (positive): Each unit sold now brings in more money. This raises TR.
- Quantity effect (negative): Fewer units are sold. This lowers TR.
Which effect wins? Whichever percentage change is bigger:
| Elasticity | What's bigger? | Result of a price INCREASE | Result of a price DECREASE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic (|PED| > 1) | Quantity change > price change | P โ โ TR โ (quantity drop wins) | P โ โ TR โ (quantity gain wins) |
| Inelastic (|PED| < 1) | Price change > quantity change | P โ โ TR โ (price gain wins) | P โ โ TR โ (price loss wins) |
| Unit Elastic (|PED| = 1) | They're equal โ cancel out | P โ โ TR unchanged | P โ โ TR unchanged |
The Classic AP Question Patterns
The College Board recycles this concept in three specific scenarios. Master each one:
Scenario 1 โ The transit fare hike: A city transit authority raises bus fares. Demand for bus rides is price-inelastic (commuters need to get to work; few substitutes in the short run). What happens to revenue?
Answer: Revenue rises. Inelastic demand โ P โ and TR โ move in the same direction. Some riders give up bus rides (Q falls), but the price increase on the remaining riders more than makes up for it.
Scenario 2 โ The drought: A drought destroys part of the peanut crop. Supply shifts left, raising the equilibrium price. Peanut farmers' revenues increase. What does this imply about the elasticity of demand for peanuts?
Answer: Demand must be price-inelastic. The price rose, quantity fell, and revenue rose anyway โ that only happens when |PED| < 1.
Scenario 3 โ The university tuition hike: A university raises student fees and wants revenue to go up. For this strategy to work, demand for the university's education must be inelastic. If demand is elastic, raising prices will actually lower revenue as students transfer to cheaper schools.
๐ฏ The decision framework: Whenever the AP gives you a price change and asks what happens to revenue (or vice versa), reach immediately for elasticity. The two pieces of info โ direction of P change and elasticity โ are all you need to predict TR.
Elasticity Varies Along a Linear Demand Curve
Here's a subtle but heavily-tested point: even though a linear demand curve has a constant slope, its elasticity is NOT constant. It changes as you move down the curve โ from very elastic at the top, through unit elastic in the middle, to inelastic at the bottom.
Why? Because elasticity depends on percentage changes, not absolute changes. Near the top of the curve, price is high and quantity is low. A $1 price drop is a small percentage of the high price, but the resulting quantity gain is a huge percentage of the tiny quantity. Result: %ฮQ >> %ฮP, so PED is large (elastic). At the bottom, the math reverses.
The Total Revenue Connection
Combine this with the Total Revenue Test, and you get a key insight: total revenue is maximized at the midpoint of a linear demand curve, where PED = 1. To the left of the midpoint (high prices, elastic region), lowering prices raises TR. To the right (low prices, inelastic region), raising prices raises TR. Both directions push you toward the midpoint.
๐ฏ The AP-favorite trap: "Moving down a linear demand curve, what happens to elasticity?" The wrong intuitive answer is "stays the same" (because slope is constant). The right answer: elasticity decreases โ starting elastic at the top, becoming unit elastic at the midpoint, then inelastic at the bottom.
Price Elasticity of Supply (PES)
Now flip to the producer side. Just like PED measures how responsive buyers are, PES measures how responsive sellers are to a price change.
Price Elasticity of Supply (PES): A measure of how responsive quantity supplied is to a change in price. Same formula structure as PED โ just with quantity supplied in the numerator.
The PES Formula
By the Law of Supply, P and Qs move together โ so PES is always positive. No absolute value needed.
Interpreting PES (Same Categories as PED)
The five categories work exactly the same way:
| PES Value | Category | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| PES = 0 | Perfectly Inelastic | Qs doesn't change at all. Vertical supply curve. Example: fixed seats at a concert that's already happening. |
| 0 < PES < 1 | Inelastic | Producers respond weakly. Common for goods with long production lead times (farm crops, oil). |
| PES = 1 | Unit Elastic | Qs changes by exactly the same % as P. |
| PES > 1 | Elastic | Producers respond strongly. Common for goods with spare capacity and quick production. |
| PES = โ | Perfectly Elastic | Producers supply unlimited quantity at one price. Horizontal supply curve. |
Quick Worked Example
If a 10% price increase causes quantity supplied to rise by 20%, then:
What Makes Supply Elastic vs. Inelastic?
Three factors drive PES:
- Time horizon โ same logic as demand. Producers need time to expand capacity, build new factories, hire workers. Short run = inelastic. Long run = more elastic.
- Availability of inputs & ease of production โ if a firm can quickly grab more raw materials and ramp up production, supply is elastic. If inputs are scarce or production is technically complex, supply is inelastic. Example: an oil refinery can't easily double output overnight, even if the price spikes โ supply of oil is inelastic in the short run.
- Spare capacity โ if firms have idle equipment and unused labor, they can quickly scale up production in response to a price rise. Supply is elastic. If they're already at maximum capacity, they can't easily produce more โ supply is inelastic.
๐ Key contrast with PED: PES doesn't have the "share of income" or "substitutes" determinants โ those are buyer-side ideas. Supply elasticity is mostly about the producer's ability to physically change output quickly.
Income Elasticity of Demand (YED)
So far, both elasticities we've studied measured responsiveness to a price change. Now we shift to measuring responsiveness to an income change.
Income Elasticity of Demand (YED): A measure of how responsive quantity demanded is to a change in consumers' income. We use "Y" for income (a common economic convention, since "I" is already taken by investment in macro).
The YED Formula
โ ๏ธ Do NOT take absolute value โ the SIGN of YED carries critical information.
The Sign Tells You the Type of Good
This is where YED gets exam-worthy. The number's value tells you how strong the response is, but the sign tells you what kind of good you're looking at.
| Sign of YED | Type of Good | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| YED > 0 (positive) |
Normal good | Income โ โ buy more. Income โ โ buy less. Examples: restaurant meals, vacations, new cars. |
| YED < 0 (negative) |
Inferior good | Income โ โ buy less. Income โ โ buy more. Examples: instant ramen, generic-brand foods, used cars. |
| YED = 0 | Income-independent | Demand doesn't respond to income at all. Rare in practice, but the AP loves to test this exact case (e.g., medical care for someone whose YED for it is zero). |
For Normal Goods: Necessity vs. Luxury (a Second Layer)
Within the category of normal goods (YED > 0), the magnitude of YED tells you whether the good is a necessity or a luxury:
- 0 < YED < 1 โ income-inelastic normal good = necessity. Income rises but consumption rises by less. Examples: bread, milk, gasoline.
- YED > 1 โ income-elastic normal good = luxury. Income rises and consumption rises by even more. Examples: yachts, designer clothing, fine dining.
Worked Example
When Tom's income rises by 10%, his quantity of golf balls purchased rises by 25%. Compute YED:
YED is positive (so golf balls are a normal good for Tom) AND greater than 1 (so they're an income-elastic normal good โ a luxury for him). Both pieces of info come from a single coefficient.
๐ฏ The AP-favorite trap: Don't strip the sign! "YED of โ0.6" tells you the good is INFERIOR, not just income-inelastic. Reading "โ0.6" as "0.6" loses half the information.
Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand (XED)
The last of our four elasticities measures how the demand for ONE good responds to a price change in a DIFFERENT good. This is the formal way to identify whether two goods are substitutes, complements, or unrelated.
Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand (XED): The percentage change in quantity demanded of good X divided by the percentage change in the price of good Y.
The XED Formula
โ ๏ธ Again, the SIGN matters โ never take absolute value.
The Sign Tells You the Relationship
| Sign of XED | Relationship between X and Y | Intuition |
|---|---|---|
| XED > 0 (positive) |
Substitutes | P of Y โ โ consumers switch to X โ Qd of X โ. The two move together (Pepsi price โ โ Coke sales โ). Same direction. |
| XED < 0 (negative) |
Complements | P of Y โ โ consumers buy less of the pair โ Qd of X โ. The two move opposite directions (PB price โ โ jelly sales โ). |
| XED = 0 | Unrelated | Goods X and Y have nothing to do with each other. P of Y changes; Qd of X doesn't move. |
A Worked Example
When the price of butter rises by 10%, the quantity of margarine demanded rises by 15%. Compute XED:
XED is positive โ butter and margarine are substitutes. The magnitude (1.5) tells you they're fairly close substitutes โ consumers switch readily between them.
๐ง Connecting back to MERIT (Section 2.1): Remember from 2.1 that when a substitute's price rises, demand for this good shifts right? XED is the formal numerical version of that statement. Positive XED = substitutes = right shift when the related good's P rises. Negative XED = complements = left shift.
The Four Elasticities Side-by-Side
Here's a one-stop reference for all four elasticities. Before the exam, you should be able to fill this in from memory.
| Elasticity | Formula | What it measures | Sign matters? |
|---|---|---|---|
| PED (Price Elasticity of Demand) |
|%ฮQd / %ฮP| | Buyer responsiveness to own-good price | No โ take absolute value. Always positive. |
| PES (Price Elasticity of Supply) |
%ฮQs / %ฮP | Seller responsiveness to own-good price | No โ naturally positive (Law of Supply). |
| YED (Income Elasticity of Demand) |
%ฮQd / %ฮY | Buyer responsiveness to income | YES. Sign reveals normal (+) vs. inferior (โ). |
| XED (Cross-Price Elasticity) |
%ฮQd of X / %ฮP of Y | Buyer responsiveness to OTHER good's price | YES. Sign reveals substitutes (+) vs. complements (โ). |
๐ฏ The pattern: Every elasticity is the same shape โ % change in one variable, divided by % change in another. Only the variables and the sign convention differ. Internalize that and you only need to memorize four numerators and four denominators.
Common Misconceptions That Cost You Points
Elasticity contains the most counterintuitive results in Unit 2. These are the trap the College Board returns to every year.
- "Slope and elasticity are the same thing." Wrong. Slope measures absolute changes; elasticity measures percentage changes. A linear demand curve has constant slope but changing elasticity along its length. They're related but not identical.
- "If demand is elastic, raising the price will raise revenue." Backwards. Elastic demand means quantity falls MORE than price rises, so revenue falls. The "I'll raise prices and make more money" reasoning only works when demand is inelastic.
- "A vertical demand curve is perfectly elastic." Backwards. Vertical = no response to price = perfectly inelastic. Horizontal = infinite response = perfectly elastic. Easy way to remember: a horizontal line is "flat as a pancake" โ flat = elastic.
- "PED, YED, and XED are all positive." Only PED (in absolute value) is always positive. YED is positive for normal goods, negative for inferior. XED is positive for substitutes, negative for complements. Stripping the sign loses critical information.
- "All necessities have low PED, and all luxuries have high PED." Usually true, but not always. The four determinants (substitutes, necessity, share of income, time) sometimes pull in different directions. Coffee is "non-essential" for many but has few substitutes for daily caffeine drinkers โ making it less elastic than the luxury label suggests.
- "In the long run, demand becomes less elastic because people get used to higher prices." Opposite. In the long run, consumers find substitutes, change habits, and adapt โ making demand more elastic over time. The short run is when people are stuck in their patterns.
- "Income elasticity of zero means demand is constant." It means demand doesn't respond to income, but it could still respond to price changes (PED โ 0) or to other goods' prices (XED โ 0). Each elasticity is independent.
- "If the price elasticity of supply is 0.5, the supply curve is elastic." No. PES = 0.5 means quantity supplied changes by HALF the percentage that price changes โ that's inelastic. PES > 1 is elastic; PES < 1 is inelastic; PES = 1 is unit elastic. The same thresholds apply as for PED.
โก 2.2 Quiz: 5 Questions
Click an answer to lock it in. You'll get a deep walkthrough of every option โ what's right, what's wrong, and the trap each distractor is designed to catch. These reflect the exact question patterns the College Board uses on Unit 2 elasticity questions.
1. If a 10 percent increase in the price of a good leads to a 25 percent decrease in the quantity demanded of the good, demand for the good is
โ Correct answer: (B)
Plug the numbers into the PED formula and check the category:
Since 2.5 > 1, demand is elastic (specifically, relatively elastic). Quantity changes by a much bigger percentage than price.
Why the other options miss the mark
- (A) Inelastic means |PED| < 1. Here |PED| = 2.5, way bigger than 1. Wrong direction entirely.
- (C) Unit elastic means |PED| = 1 exactly. Here it's 2.5, not 1.
- (D) Perfectly elastic means |PED| = โ (infinite). 2.5 is finite, so this doesn't fit.
- (E) Perfectly inelastic means |PED| = 0. Here quantity clearly did change, so PED isn't zero.
๐ Review: See "Price Elasticity of Demand (PED)" and "Interpreting the PED Coefficient" โ the five categories defined by where the coefficient sits relative to 1.
2. Which of the following statements about the price elasticity of demand is true?
โ Correct answer: (D)
The availability of substitutes is the most important determinant of price elasticity of demand. When close substitutes exist, consumers can easily switch in response to a price increase, so quantity demanded falls sharply โ that's the definition of elastic demand. More substitutes โ easier to switch โ more elastic.
Why the other options miss the mark
- (A) Backwards on the Total Revenue Test. Inelastic demand means P and TR move in the same direction. P โ โ TR โ, not down.
- (B) Backwards again. Elastic demand means P and TR move in opposite directions. P โ โ TR โ, not up.
- (C) Time horizon works the opposite way. Demand tends to be more elastic in the long run (more time to find substitutes and adjust), not in the short run.
- (E) Necessities are less elastic than luxuries, not more. People keep buying necessities even when prices rise โ that's almost the definition of inelastic demand.
๐ Review: Re-read "What Makes Demand More or Less Elastic?" The four determinants table is your friend โ substitutes, necessity/luxury, share of income, time horizon. Know which direction each one pushes elasticity.
3. A severe drought destroys a significant portion of the peanut crop. The supply of peanuts shifts left, raising the equilibrium price. If peanut farmers' total revenues increase over the observed range of prices, which of the following must be true?
โ Correct answer: (C)
Apply the Total Revenue Test in reverse. We know two things: the price rose, and revenue also rose. Both moved in the same direction. That's only consistent with one elasticity category:
The intuition: when the price rose, quantity fell (Law of Demand), but quantity fell by a smaller percentage than price rose. The price gain on the remaining units more than made up for the lost units, so total revenue grew. That's the defining feature of inelastic demand.
Why the other options miss the mark
- (A) Unit elastic โ if demand were unit elastic, TR would stay constant. The question says TR rose, so unit elastic doesn't fit.
- (B) Elastic โ if demand were elastic, P โ would cause TR to fall, not rise. Wrong direction.
- (D) Supply inelastic โ supply elasticity has nothing to do with what happens to revenue when price changes. We're testing demand here.
- (E) Supply elastic โ same problem as (D). Plus, after a drought, supply is by definition restricted, but that doesn't tell us about TR.
๐ Review: The Total Revenue Test rules: elastic โ P and TR opposite; inelastic โ P and TR same; unit elastic โ TR unchanged. Memorize these and reverse-engineer them when given the TR direction.
4. When Sandra's income increases by 10 percent, her consumption of milk decreases from 20 cartons to 18 cartons per month. Sandra's income elasticity of demand for milk is
โ Correct answer: (D)
Compute YED step-by-step.
YED is negative (less than zero) โ milk is an inferior good for Sandra. When her income went up, she bought less milk (possibly substituting toward beverages she now finds more attractive, like fresh juice or specialty coffee). The magnitude of โ1.0 also tells us the response is sizable.
Why the other options miss the mark
- (A) YED > 0 would mean income โ โ consumption โ. But Sandra consumed less milk when her income rose, so YED is negative, not positive.
- (B) Contradictory: YED > 0 means normal good, not inferior. The sign and the label have to match.
- (C) Contradictory in the other direction: YED < 0 means inferior good, not normal.
- (E) "Income-elastic" applies to normal goods with YED > 1. Even in absolute value, |YED| = 1 is unit elastic, not strictly income-elastic. And the sign is negative, so this isn't even a normal good.
๐ Review: See "Income Elasticity of Demand (YED)" โ the sign reveals the type (normal vs. inferior), and the magnitude reveals the strength (necessity vs. luxury for normal goods).
5. The cross-price elasticity of demand between flashlights and Good H is +2.5. This indicates which of the following?
โ Correct answer: (A)
For cross-price elasticity:
- Positive XED โ goods are substitutes (price of Y rises, demand for X rises โ they're alternatives)
- Negative XED โ goods are complements
- Zero XED โ goods are unrelated
XED = +2.5 is positive โ substitutes. The relatively large magnitude (well above 1) indicates they're close substitutes โ consumers switch readily between them. A small positive value (like +0.3) would mean weak substitutes; +2.5 is strong.
Why the other options miss the mark
- (B) Complements have negative XED. Positive XED rules out complements entirely.
- (C) Unrelated goods have XED โ 0. +2.5 is far from zero.
- (D) This option confuses cross-price elasticity (XED) with income elasticity (YED). Normal vs. inferior is YED territory; XED is about the relationship between two goods, not about their relationship to income.
- (E) Same category confusion. Whether each good is individually price-elastic depends on its own-price elasticity (PED), not on the cross-price elasticity between them.
๐ Review: See "Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand (XED)" and the "Four Elasticities Side-by-Side" summary table. Each elasticity asks a different question โ be careful not to mix them up.
Ready for more? Move on to 2.3 Market Equilibrium & Surplus โ or jump to the Unit 2 Practice Test โ
End of Section 2.2. Up next: 2.3 Market Equilibrium, Consumer & Producer Surplus โ putting demand and supply together to find the market-clearing price, and measuring who gains from trade.